True or False: Performing complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) on animals is considered the practice of veterinary medicine.

Performing complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) on animals is indeed considered the practice of veterinary medicine. This recognition stems from the fact that any intervention that aims to diagnose, treat, or prevent health issues in animals falls within the scope of veterinary practice. Regulations set forth by bodies like the College of Veterinarians of Ontario encompass a wide range of treatments, including those classified as complementary or alternative. This means that veterinarians must maintain the same standards of care and professional accountability when using CAM modalities as they do with conventional medicine.

Additionally, for veterinarians practicing any form of veterinary medicine, including CAM, it is essential to ensure that their actions are informed by evidence-based practices and are in the best interest of the animal's health. This underscores the importance of maintaining ethical and professional standards regardless of the treatment approach.

In contrast, viewing the statement as false would imply that CAM is somehow exempt from the regulatory framework governing veterinary practice, which is not the case. Similarly, suggesting it depends on the situation or marking it as not applicable would overlook the clear guidelines affirming that all veterinary practices, regardless of type, must adhere to the appropriate legal and ethical standards governing animal care.