For high-risk procedures on companion animals, what type of consent is best to obtain?

Obtaining written consent for high-risk procedures on companion animals is the best practice because it ensures that there is a clear and documented understanding between the veterinarian and the pet owner regarding the specifics of the procedure, including the risks involved and any alternative options. Written consent serves as a legal safeguard for both the veterinarian and the pet owner, providing evidence that the owner has been informed and has agreed to proceed.

This document can help protect the veterinarian from potential liability should any disputes arise regarding the procedure or its outcomes, as it clearly outlines the expectations and understanding at the time of consent. In cases involving high-risk procedures, the complexity and potential consequences warrant a more comprehensive approach to informed consent to ensure that the owner is fully aware of what the procedure entails and has had the opportunity to ask questions.

While verbal consent can be appropriate in many situations, it lacks the same level of documentation and security as written consent. Implied consent may be suitable for routine care but is insufficient for high-risk procedures, which require explicit understanding and agreement. Claiming that no consent is needed would not align with ethical and legal responsibilities in veterinary practice. Thus, written consent is the most responsible and professional approach in these cases.